There is a large part of our government that is pushing strongly toward Russian confrontation. Our media is constantly using the term “elections were hacked” though whenever you get into the details they are really referring to the CIA claim that the DNC emails where hacked which is a political organization and NOT an election. This CIA claim is also counter to FBI and NSA claims that there was no evidence of Russia involvement. Why constantly use incorrect language of “election hack”? Assume the DNC email’s were hacked and not leaked ,what if evidence showed a hack from Australia? Would there be this same level of rhetoric?
I personally believe it was a leak by a DNC insider wanting to expose corruption within the party and particularly against Bernie. The trend was a movement to elect someone not considered a D.C. insider. The DNC chair Wasserman Schultz was forced to resign the next day after being exposed in an email that the DNC was actively working against Bernie. Wasserman was then hired immediately by Hillary for her campaign. You can’t make this stuff up.
[shock_spots id=”255″]
The amount of Bullshit that is coming at you right now is mind blowing. On the same level as WMD’s in Iraq pre 2003.
I do not typically watch CNN or any network news on TV. Because of the traveling this past week, I have tuned in a bit more. CNN is pushing the propaganda hard. They keep stating that the elections were hacked as if Russians got into the voting machines. This is completely disingenuous and people are unfortunately lapping it up.
Read more about a DNC email hack vs insider leak here.
The Tao forum is also actively discussing the issue.
by 