It is really quite astounding. For those that do not follow Martin Armstrong’s blog his computer predicted a Brexit a long time ago. He himself doubted that it would happen, he thought the vote would be too close and would result in favor of Brussels as they would tip it to themselves. However, his computer was correct.
His computer then predicted a Trump win as Trump was the outside candidate and that this type of win was due in the cycle. Again, even while everyone thought Hillary would win, including many dynamic predictive sites like fivethirtyeight.com it now looks like Trump will be the winner.
[shock_spots id=”255″]
I’m now listening to news anchors try and explain the results and confess that they were incorrect. From Armstrong’s blog last week:
I still “believe” that they will rig the election to prevent a Trump victory despite the fact that our computer projects a Trump victory and more importantly, that this is a major clash with people who want their country back. Already, Texas has broken all records for the number of people coming out to vote early. This seems to confirm our computer will be right on that forecast that this should be the biggest turnout for the past 23 elections.
Our computer has NEVER been wrong except one time – the election of 2000. There the Supreme Count handed the election to Bush and would not wait for a recount, which ultimately showed Gore should have won. So a Clinton victory will send us into war and the economy down hard and dirty. That appears to be more likely from the market perspective with the bubble top in bonds. But this will be a rigged outcome and that will send what she calls the “deplorables” into rising civil unrest.
Note in the above quote Armstrong gave his opinion, but states what his computer says. This is a often theme as he often is surprised by what the computer is telling him stating, “that can’t be right”. You can find similar posts through out his blog during the election year.
So what now as the market is dropping fast? His computer predicts a 3 day reaction, at that point it’s watching bullish and bearish reversals related to timing going forward.
If the DNC wanted to win they should have LISTENED to what the people wanted. The DNC establishment and the establishment in general fought against Bernie. Wasserman Shultz was exposed to be actively fighting against Bernie thanks to Wikileaks. Wasserman had to leave the DNC because of the scandal and Hillary hired her the next day.
Who needs fiction? Hat tip to Martin Armstrong. I highly recommend you follow his blog.
by 