OWNx.com
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Syria gas attack, diabolical, false flag, or both?
#1
I honestly don't know what to make of the gas attack in Syria.  I think though, it can be divided into two narratives.  

First narrative from the West and U.S.:

The Syrian government is so craven and evil it gasses women and children in rebel held territories. It doesn't care what the world thinks, and doesn't think there will be reprocussions severe enough to matter.  

Second narrative from Russia and Syria: 

This is a false flag operation we predicted weeks ago.  We see no concrete evidence of a gas attack and why would Assad do such a thing in a war he is already winning?  What possible advantage could the Syrians gain from doing this that would not be far out weighed by the negatives?  Even if there was a gas attack, it was probably done by the rebels themselves to get the U.S. to  attack Assad's forces.

Either one of these narratives means there is some serious evil going on here.  Which one is the truth? Or is the truth found elsewhere?  It does seem military action is coming from this, which could escalate in very bad ways.   Too bad we don't have a press that will investigate this event objectively, and not just be a mouthpiece for one faction or another.  That's the problem with lying to people, you lose your credibility.  It all just becomes propaganda and that has serious consequences too.

But that's the latest from the West too. They are saying  Putin is so evil he uses propaganda to obfuscate his actions.  The Russians use misinformation to muddy the waters, and use it to undermine the West.
Reply
#2
The correct answer is almost always whatever will provide the greatest profits to defense contractors.
I dream of an America where a chicken can cross the road without having it's motives questioned.
Reply
#3
When the Red Cross say it's a thing, it's a thing.
Reply
#4
(04-10-2018, 06:33 AM)andrew_o Wrote: When the Red Cross say it's a thing, it's a thing.

As I understand it, Andrew, the Syrian army won't let outside observers (e.g. the Red Cross) access to the site.

Putin says as soon as the town is conquered and occupied the Syrian army will allow access to the site by outside observers.
Reply
#5
(04-10-2018, 06:33 AM)andrew_o Wrote: When the Red Cross say it's a thing, it's a thing.

Yes, I too think it's a thing (even that is debatable though), but whose thing is it?  How can we ever know with no reliable sources?  I, for one, no longer trust a word that comes out of the U.S. government after being lied to so repeatedly.

(04-09-2018, 11:40 PM)Innocynic Wrote: The correct answer is almost always whatever will provide the greatest profits to defense contractors.

If you look at who benefits from this as the likely cause agent, then I agree the military industrial complex is the most logical answer.  If so, we are heading for a world of hurt. If the Russians and Syrians are innocent of this gas attack,  how will they react when they are bombed by the U.S.?

The Neo Cons have lied us into war before. Are they doing it again?  Just last week Trump was saying he wanted to get out of Syria soon.
Reply
#6
(04-10-2018, 06:33 AM)andrew_o Wrote: When the Red Cross say it's a thing, it's a thing.

Yes it happened. BUT WHO.

Watch Tucker here: http://taoeconomics.com/deepstate-pushin...-in-syria/



Reply
#7
(04-10-2018, 02:49 PM)StingingNettle Wrote:
(04-10-2018, 06:33 AM)andrew_o Wrote: When the Red Cross say it's a thing, it's a thing.

Yes it happened.  BUT WHO.

Watch Tucker  here: http://taoeconomics.com/deepstate-pushin...-in-syria/


But......but.....didn't Trump just put the deepest of the deepest state crazies into power yesterday ?

[Image: boltontrumpo.jpg]
Reply
#8
Yes, Aqua, and you can thank your Democrat friends, their alliance with the deep state and Neo Cons for all of it.
Reply
#9
(04-10-2018, 06:33 AM)andrew_o Wrote: When the Red Cross say it's a thing, it's a thing.

The Red Cross said it was GAS,

it did NOT SAY WHO did it


for you to insinuate OTHERWISE is your constant style of fraud
Reply
#10
(04-10-2018, 08:51 PM)doubletroublejim Wrote: Yes, Aqua, and you can thank your Democrat friends, their alliance with the deep state and Neo Cons for all of it.

I am 100% certain the one who put him into that job is a Republican.

[Image: ows_146534117128259.jpg]
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
OWNx.com